Whereas O’Donnell laudably experimented with to focus the audience’s consideration onand hopefully previous, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen below for high-quality, I used to be overtaken, not through the pulling on the thread, along with the voracious audience he serves. It did not make me unhappy, it crafted me angry.
With regards to celebrities, we could be a heartless country, basking in their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some degree. It can be grating to listen to complaints from most people who like privileges that most of us cannot even think about. If you can’t muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who helps make even more capital for a day’s work than most of us will make inside of a decade’s time, I guess I cannot blame you.
Using the quick tempo of events online as well as the information revolution sparked through the Web, it’s pretty quick for the technology marketplace to consider it is unique: consistently breaking new ground and undertaking facts that no one has ever before undertaken prior to.
But there are actually other kinds of organization which have previously undergone a lot of the very same radical shifts, and also have just as fantastic a stake with the potential.
Get healthcare, for example.
We usually believe of it being a enormous, lumbering beast, but in fact, medicine has undergone a sequence of revolutions within the past 200 many years which might be not less than equal to those we see in technology and details.
Significantly less understandable, but even now inside the norms of human nature, will be the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and take a look at the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but of your blithe interviewer Sheen’s life as we pass it during the right lane of our everyday lives. To become straightforward, it may be challenging for persons to discern the big difference involving a run-of-the-mill focus whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its individual merits, a quote like “I Am On a Drug. It is Identified as Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we cannot all be expected to take the full measure of someone’s everyday living any time we listen to a little something amusing.
Speedy ahead to 2011 and I'm trying to investigate implies of becoming a little more business-like about my hobbies (mostly new music). By the stop of January I had manned up and commenced to promote my blogs. I had developed a variety of unique blogs, which were contributed to by buddies and colleagues. I promoted these actions by means of Facebook and Twitter.
2nd: the very little abomination the Gang of Five on the Supream Court gave us a yr or so back (Citizens Inebriated) actually is made up of a touch bouncing betty of its personal that can highly effectively go off while in the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Given that this ruling prolonged the notion of “personhood” to the two corporations and unions, to try to deny them any suitable to run inside the legal framework that they have been organized under deprives these “persons” on the freedoms of speech, association and motion. Which suggests (as soon as once more, quoting law school skilled spouse and children) that possibly the courts ought to uphold these rights for your unions (as individual “persons” as guaranteed from the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they've to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights really have to utilize to significant corporations, also.
Actually, these bastards are going to end up hanging themselves on a couple of points (not my words, but family deeply involved in the legal business as lawyers and law professors).
First, there is a little point of technicality called the “Equal Protection Clause(s) of the U.S. Constitution, which pretty pointedly states that it is not exactly legal to try to deny guaranteed rights (under the constitution) from any one group of citizens. This is what ultimately torpedoed much of segregation (and Jim Crow laws) in the Deep South, and why the attempts to impose a modern day equivalent in Arizona are unlikely to survive a constitutional challenge. Trying to deprive these state union members of legally recognized rights, in organizations that are recognized as legitimate under both state and federal laws, is going to set off a whole minefield of legal issues, and could extend way beyond just the rights of union members to seek representation for collective bargaining purposes. Such as the rights of any number of groups to organize and hold meetings about common points of interest. Not too great an extension to say that if this bullshit can fly (what the Spotted Wanker is pushing in WI) than some other governor with a rubber stamp legislature could turn his attention to stripping rights from gays. Or blacks. Or Jews. Or whoever the hell these goons feel like ganging up on. That is why the poem from the 1930s has never lost any of its power…”first, they came for the trade unionists, but I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a trade unionist…” (apologies if this quote is not completely accurate or otherwise misstated) )
Second: the little abomination that the Gang of Five on the Supream Court gave us a year or so ago (Citizens Inebriated) actually contains a little bouncing betty of its own that could very well go off in the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Since this ruling extended the concept of “personhood” to both corporations and unions, to try to deny them any right to operate within the legal framework that they were organized under deprives these “persons” of the freedoms of speech, association and movement. Which means (once again, quoting law school trained family) that either the courts have to uphold these rights for the unions (as individual “persons” as guaranteed by the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they have to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights have to apply to major corporations, also.
Not quite. Convincing people not to pirate is not the same as convincing them to pay--which is supposed to be the end goal, right? However, not all is lost on "pirates". Like any other demographic, you have to know what the market wants. One thing to separate is those who can't buy, but would, and those who are not interested in paying. Even with global trade and the internet, regional licensing still tends to delay or even block entire markets. Obviously, you have to be able to sell to the market before you can get anyone to buy, so the issue of legacy middle-men has to be addressed before you can consider piracy.
Others that pirate doesn't mean that they won't pay. Like any other non-costumer, you have to figure out what they want. As you pointed out, getting to a price point that they're willing to pay helps. You know, like a $15 CD vs. $1 track on iTunes. Others are drawn by convenience. Again, the CD vs. iTunes comparison comes to mind.
Pirates that are completely uninterested in paying money for infinite goods aren't necessarily unwilling to pay. For those who still value convenience maybe willing to pay with time through ad-sponsored streaming. Hulu and internet radio are quite popular. Some even still use traditional broadcast too.
Even for those geeky enough to consider setting up a BitTorrent client to automatically pull RSS-feeds "convenient", there's always merchandising. Yes, I know you're laughing, but it is a multi-billion dollar industry, and it is one thing that geeks who would never pay for intangibles actually buy. Think about it, who buys all of those geeky action figures, memorabilia, and logo-wear? GEEKS! And even those who won't buy this stuff still wear promo tee-shirts that are given out at events. Sure, those cost money, but the whole point is to get people to be walking billboards advertising the product.
And speaking of PR...even those who won't buy anything aren't completely anti-social--they tell their friends and family about their experiences. Some consider the pirate a "lost" sale, but everyone they get to buy who otherwise wouldn't have is still a sale all the same. I'm not saying it completely balances out, but a sale is a sale, and getting people to pay is the goal, right? Of course, not all PR is good PR, so word of mouth advertising only works for things that people actually like. I guess that's the real reason the movie and recording industry hates piracy--it's harder to con people into paying if they've already heard the products stinks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Source: http://removeripoffreports.net/ online reputation management
The best in online reputation management
No comments:
Post a Comment